Archives

Unionized Employee Reinstated to Permit Application for Long-Term Disability Benefits

Posted on: January 21, 2015

In November 2012, labour arbitrator William Kaplan decided the grievance case of Agropur Division Natrel v. Teamsters Local 647 (Grievance of JF), 2012 CanLII 69477, regarding the termination of a disabled employee requesting reinstatement. The grievor, JF, was a 10-year employee of Agropur Division Natrel, a leading Canadian dairy products producer.  JF worked as a […]

Abuse of Process

Posted on:

In the recent decision, Power Tax Corporation v. Millar et al. (2013), 113 O.R. (3d) 502, 2013 ONSC 135, the Honourable Mr. Justice Goldstein of the Ontario Superior Court considered the doctrine of abuse of process in a case where there were two parallel proceedings addressing the same essential issue.  The concept of abuse of […]

Clever Lawyering Fails to Thwart Summary Judgment Motion

Posted on:

In the recent summary judgment motion of Baywood Homes v Alex Haditaghi, 2013 ONSC 2145, Justice Belobaba, for the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto, took the opportunity to opine on the test for summary judgment under Rule 20 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Summary judgment is available to both plaintiffs and defendants, […]

Motion to Compel Disclosure – Evidence-based Inquiry

Posted on:

Incorporating new technologies into the Rules of Civil Procedure can sometimes present challenges for both litigants and courts.  In the recent case of Stewart v Kempster, 2012 ONSC 7236, Justice Heeney dismissed a motion by the defendants seeking an order compelling the plaintiff to produce all vacation photos since the date of her car accident […]

Part One – CEP, Local 30 v. Irving Pulp & Paper – Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling on Alcohol Testing in Unionized Workplaces

Posted on:

Background The legal status of random drug and alcohol testing in Canadian workplaces has been very unclear for some time.  It has been accepted that drug and alcohol addiction is a disability within the context of human rights law, and as such, random drug and alcohol testing programs potentially raise discrimination issues because they disproportionately […]